Western politicians are not looking after the national interest – whose interests are they looking after?

Professor Richard Werner says that in Western countries, “we have people in charge who do not look after the national interest and have other motives, other goals”

Nearly 25 years ago, Dr. Michael S. Coffman warned us that this was coming.  So, who is really in charge and what are their goals?  Dr. Coffman explained in a speech at the Granada Forum held during or before 2001.

On Tuesday, Richard Werner, Professor of Banking and Economics at the University of Winchester, joined Rick Sanchez on RT’s ‘Sanchez Effect’ to discuss Europe’s economic woes.

In Western countries  that are in economic and greater fiscal difficulties,” Prof. Werner said, “we have people in charge who do not look after the national interest and have other motives, other goals.”

(https://rumble.com/v6yua3o-richard-werner-in-the-long-term-the-dollar-is-dead.html)

Why do Western leaders seemingly tank their economies on purpose? Source: Raymond on Twitter, 10 September 2025

The clip above is taken from an interview on RT’s Sanchez Effect, hosted by Rick Sanchez.  You can watch the full segment on Rumble HERE and on Odysee HERE (starting at timestamp 20:20).

To help us begin to understand what these “other motives” and “other goals” are, we turn to a speech made around 2001 by the late Dr. Michael S. Coffman at the Granada Forum.  Dr. Coffman passed away in 2017, as reported by InfoWars.

Dr. Coffman had a PhD in Forest Science.  He was a retired paper industry executive, a property rights advocate and a global warming sceptic known for his work with Environmental Perspectives, Inc. and Sovereignty International, focusing on issues such as Agenda 21, the Convention on Biological Diversity and the perceived threat of a New World Order.

Below is a summary of his speech at the Granada Forum.  You can watch his speech in the video embedded at the end of this article. 

In his speech, Dr. Coffman focuses on the environmental aspect, but there are other strings to the Globalists’ bow.  To implement their plan, they manufacture crises – disease, war, famine, political and/or economic – and then use these crises to impose parts of their agenda, their solution, on us.  It is the problem-reaction-solution strategy (also known as the Hegelian Dialectic).  Covid was one such manufactured crisis; the so-called climate change crisis is another.

We are only at the beginning of the implementation of the Globalists’ plan.  Agenda 21 is their agenda for the 21^st century.  They have detailed plans for each decade of this century, beginning with the current decade  – Agenda 2030.  They plan to complete the implementation of Agenda 21 by the end of this century, i.e. by 2100, with the completion of the implementation of Agenda 2100.

As Professor Dolores Cahill warned in 2022, “They are basically planning, and are implementing, the destruction of each area of our society from within.”

The Road to World Government

The United Nations was sold to the American people in 1945 with no intention of creating a world government, Dr. Coffman said. But the following year, Assistant Secretary William Bennett Abenton stated that nationalism is an obstacle to world-mindedness and the school should combat family attitudes that favour nationalism.

“As long as a child breathes the poisoned air of nationalism, education, and world-mindedness can produce only precarious results.  As we have pointed out, it is frequently the family that infects the child with extreme nationalism. The school should therefore use the means described earlier to combat family attitudes that favour jingolism [or as it’s defined, nationalism]. And we shall see presently recognise in nationalism the major obstacle to development of world-mindedness.  We are at the beginning of a long process of breaking down the walls of national sovereignty. UNESCO must be the pioneer.”—William Bennett Abenton, Assistant US Secretary of State, speech at UNESCO, 1946

“That was 54 years ago, and we’re almost there now,” Dr. Coffman said, referring to the quote above.  “Perhaps by the end of the year 2001, we will have a world government.  Now, it may not happen that soon, and we’ll discuss the ins and outs and the ramifications of what’s likely to happen a little bit later on in my discussion.”

How do they plan to accomplish their world takeover?  Dr. Coffman referred to the 1966 book called ‘Tragedy and Hope’ written by Professor Carroll Quigley.  It describes, in detail, the global elites’ plan to create a world system of financial control in private hands.

“…[T]he powers of financial capitalism [the global elite] had another far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert by secret agreements arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences. The apex of the system was to be the Bank for International Settlements in Basle, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the world’s central banks which were themselves private corporations….”—Carroll Quigley, quoting an unnamed book, ‘Tragedy and Hope: A History of the World in Our Time’, 1966

The Globalists are promoting a world government through various means, including a core of people at the Council on Foreign Relations.  They realised that they could no longer use the threat of war to control populations.  So, they searched for a new threat.  “They settled on – in 1967 in their publication called the ‘Iron Mountain Report’ – the environmental holocaust,” Dr. Coffman said.  “In 1970, three years after that publication, the Council on Foreign Relations began to publish a series of articles in its Foreign Affairs publication describing the ecological holocaust that was facing the world.”  The first was an article written by George Kennan titled ‘To Prevent a World Disaster’.

The world government, Dr. Coffman explained, is made up of the “unholy triad” of “government, specifically the United Nations, business and non-governmental organisations, operating under a central international super agency.”  (Note from The Exposé: Today, this “unholy triad” is referred to as the Global Public Private Partnership, abbreviated to GPPP or G3P.)

“They call it global governance, and they’ll always refer to it as global governance and will adamantly deny that this is world government. But you cannot govern without government. It’s impossible,” Dr. Coffman said.

What will this world government look like? It is an absolute totalitarian world government, where the state has absolute control and people are mere tools of the state. 

“If you take nothing away from [this talk], realise that we’re looking at an absolute totalitarian government that they’re trying to establish,” Dr. Coffman emphasised.  The goal is to reverse the established order of things, for example, the US Constitution and civil rights.  “A statist type of government in which the state is all-powerful.”

https://www.youtube.com/embed/OVrpRGwKZY0?feature=oembed Ivor Cummins: The One Video You and Your Family Need to Watch Today – Revelatory! 1 September 2025 (38 mins)

If the video above is removed from YouTube, you can watch it on Rumble HERE. https://rumble.com/v6yu89k-dr.-michael-s.-coffman.html

Full article here: https://expose-news.com/2025/09/12/whose-interests-are-politicians-looking-after/

==============

RELATED

People may love freedom, but they don’t always love the responsibility that freedom demands

Liberty is not merely the absence of coercion but a learned skill and a habit of self-governance that requires active participation and responsibility.  This is the central idea of Alexis de Tocqueville’s psychology of freedom.

Freedom, Tocqueville warned, can be quietly eroded in democracies not by force, but through the voluntary surrender of personal responsibility to the state, leading to a “subtle surrender of freedom” where people, seeking security, relinquish their autonomy.

This psychological shift, driven by a desire to avoid the burdens of choice and the anxiety of uncertainty, results in a passive citizenry dependent on government, ultimately undermining the very foundations of a free society.

More here: https://expose-news.com/2025/09/21/people-may-love-freedom-but/